Book Appointment Now



HVCH coolant compatibility cannot be confirmed from a glycol percentage or an “EV coolant” label alone. Before releasing a high-voltage coolant heater into a bus or truck circuit, identify the exact fluid and obtain configuration-specific confirmation from the heater supplier and the vehicle’s thermal-system owner.
The review should cover the fluid formulation, concentration, dilution water, wetted materials and intended operating conditions. This checklist is for OEM engineering and procurement teams. It does not approve a coolant brand for an EVLINK heater or provide a universal conductivity limit.
Give the supplier a product name, manufacturer, formulation or product code, current technical data sheet and safety data sheet. State whether it is supplied ready to use or mixed from concentrate. Record the intended concentration and whether the ratio is specified by volume or mass.
A safety data sheet supports handling and hazard review; it should not be treated as a component-compatibility certificate. Ask which approval documents or test evidence cover the proposed fluid in the selected heater assembly. Where only a generic fluid family is listed, request clarification before ordering the production configuration.
Two fluids described with the same glycol ratio need not have the same additive package or approval status. GLYSANTIN’s product-selection guidance emphasizes product-specific approvals and restrictions on mixing its different coolant technologies. That is a reason to check the exact formulation, not a basis for approving or rejecting every fluid from another manufacturer.
Document the required freeze protection alongside the heater’s operating envelope, pump and heat-exchanger requirements. Do not choose a concentration solely to improve one property, then assume the existing flow or heating validation still applies. Use the actual fluid data and the supplier’s approved conditions in the HVCH flow and pressure-drop review.
Different EV cooling architectures can call for different fluid characteristics. Arteco’s EV-OAT explanation specifically distinguishes that technology from applications requiring low or reduced electrical conductivity. A fluid being marketed for EVs therefore does not establish that it meets your circuit’s electrical requirements.
Ask the vehicle-system owner to define whether conductivity is controlled, the measurement conditions and the applicable acceptance evidence. Then ask the heater supplier to confirm compatibility with that exact fluid. Low conductivity is a fluid property, not permission to omit high-voltage isolation, protection or the vehicle’s electrical-safety validation.
Request confirmation for the selected heater assembly, including its wetted metals, joints and seals where applicable. A generic statement that a fluid is suitable for aluminum does not establish approval for every assembled component in the loop. Include the pump, hoses, battery heat exchanger and other wetted components in the system-level review.
The following evidence requests help define what remains open:
This is a suggested document-review checklist, not a prescribed test standard. Do not substitute a short warm-up run for missing compatibility evidence: it answers a different question from long-term material suitability.
Arteco’s water-quality guidance explains how ionic impurities can affect coolant conductivity and how unsuitable water can contribute to scale or corrosion. Its limits are product-specific; obtain the dilution-water requirements for the fluid you intend to use rather than transferring a number from another product.
For production and service planning, identify the approved fill product, mixing method where applicable, clean handling arrangements and permitted top-up procedure. Do not dilute a ready-mixed product unless its released instructions allow it. Keep records sufficient to distinguish a fluid change from a heater or control change during later investigation.
If a formulation, concentration or top-up fluid changes, ask the responsible suppliers which compatibility and performance evidence must be renewed. Agree the handling of residual old fluid and the approved flushing procedure before the change. Qualified staff must follow the vehicle’s isolation, cooling and fluid-handling procedures; this article is not a workshop drain-and-fill instruction.
No. Freeze protection does not establish additive chemistry, material compatibility or the required electrical properties. Compare the full fluid specification and the component and vehicle approval evidence.
No. Ask for written confirmation for the exact heater configuration, formulation and operating conditions. Do not infer EVLINK approval from another heater manufacturer’s product description.
Request the updated formulation identity and documents, identify the affected component approvals and agree the necessary revalidation before introducing it. Record who authorized the change and which configurations it covers.
Start with the EVLINK high-voltage coolant heater range, then provide your intended heater configuration, exact coolant TDS/SDS, concentration, circuit layout, operating conditions and any conductivity requirements. State which vehicle-level approvals are already defined and which need clarification.
Send your heater and coolant specification for an engineering discussion. Request configuration-specific confirmation before treating a quotation, a product image or this general checklist as fluid-compatibility approval.

Define heat pump and HVCH duties for electric buses and trucks. Review supplemental heat, shared-loop priorities, power limits and mode-transition evidence.

Compare BTMS cooling capacity at matched coolant, ambient and electrical conditions. Request the evidence needed for electric bus and truck selection.

Every braking resistor RFQ we receive contains the same two numbers: a DC bus voltage and a braking power. The buyer wants one number back
To make it easier for you to receive a quote, simply leave your information, and we will contact you as soon as possible.